Refusal Cases

Home

DUI

Refusal Cases

Refusal Cases in DUI Arrests

Drivers arrested for DUI must provide a blood or breath sample for chemical testing under the California's Implied Consent Law. Refusing this test can lead to serious consequences both with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and in court. A refusal, as defined by police and prosecutors, can be express (a direct refusal) or implied (when the driver does not explicitly refuse but still does not agree to take a test, or just does not speak). While drivers are required to stop at a DUI checkpoint, they are not required to participate in field sobriety tests or answer questions beyond the basics. This aligns with sobriety checkpoint laws, which require drivers to stop but do not mandate participation in field sobriety tests.

‍

Implied Refusals

Not all refusals are clear-cut. For example:

A driver may attempt to take a breath test but fail to provide a sufficient sample due to illness or injury. If the officer doesn't offer an alternative test (like a blood test), this could be misinterpreted as a refusal, but may be excused.
In cases where a driver initially refuses a breath test but is then subjected to a blood draw without further objection, this may still be considered a refusal by the DMV and/or the court.

If a driver is physically unable to refuse due to injury or unconsciousness, a refusal may also be excused. Additionally, if an officer fails to explain the consequences of refusal, the refusal may be invalidated.

‍

Consequences of Refusing a Chemical Test

A refusal carries serious penalties with both the DMV and the courts. At the DMV, a first-time refusal leads to a one-year license suspension with no option for a restricted license. Multiple refusals increase the penalties:

Second offense: Two-year suspension.
Third offense: Three-year suspension.
Fourth offense: Four-year license revocation, regardless of refusal.

In court, refusal can be used as a justification for a longer DUI school and other sentencing consequences.

‍

Jury Instructions on Refusal

In court, juries are instructed that refusal may imply consciousness of guilt, but they must also consider any valid reasons for the refusal. For instance, if a driver was injured, confused, or asked for legal counsel, the refusal may be excused. Prosecutors often argue that the refusal indicates guilt, but juries may not convict solely based on refusal without considering all the circumstances.

‍

California DUI Chemical Test Refusal: Penalties & Consequences

Refusal Type	DMV Penalty	Court Consequence	Notes/Exceptions
First Refusal	1-year license suspension	Longer DUI school; possible harsher sentence	Officer must advise refusal consequences; failure to advise can be challenged
Second Refusal	2-year license suspension	Increased penalties; possible jail time	Applies if within look-back period
Third Refusal	3-year license suspension	Even harsher sentencing	Applies within look-back period
Fourth Refusal	4-year license revocation	Maximum administrative removal	No restricted license option
Implied Refusal (medical/ability issues)	Potential excusal if documented	May be excused in court	Medical conditions must be clearly supported
Forced Blood Draw (with warrant)	Refusal penalties still apply	Results may be challenged	Must be medically proper & constitutional

‍

Forced Blood Draws

If a driver refuses chemical testing, police can sometimes force a blood draw under specific circumstances, such as after a lawful arrest and with reasonable belief of intoxication, and the approval of a judge. While this is allowed under the Schmerber v. California ruling, failure to follow proper procedures can lead to a suppression of the blood test results. A skilled California DUI Lawyer can challenge forced blood draws if constitutional rights are violated during the process. Even if the arresting officer is authorized to force a blood draw, the blood must still be done in a “medically approved manner.”

‍

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if I refuse a DUI chemical test?

Refusing a required chemical test after a DUI arrest in California triggers serious consequences. The Department of Motor Vehicles typically suspends your driver’s license (e.g., 1 year for a first refusal), and in court, prosecutors may argue that refusal shows consciousness of guilt. Refusal penalties apply even if a warrant is later obtained for a forced blood draw.

Can a refusal be excused?

Yes. A refusal may be excused if valid reasons exist, such as physical inability to provide a sample, medical issues, or if the officer failed to properly explain the consequences of refusal under California’s implied consent law. When these factors are documented, both DMV and court consequences may be reduced or avoided.

How does a second refusal affect my license?

A second DUI chemical test refusal in California usually leads to a two-year license suspension at the DMV, with harsher administrative consequences than a first refusal. Court penalties (such as longer DUI school or increased jail exposure) may also be greater, particularly within the five- to ten-year DUI look-back period.

Can officers draw blood without consent?

In some cases, law enforcement may seek a warrant to obtain a blood sample after you refuse testing. Under federal and California law, officers may perform a blood draw if a judge signs a warrant and the procedure is conducted in a medically approved manner. However, improper warrant procedures or constitutional violations during the draw can be challenged to suppress evidence.